Water customers steaming over increased sewer charge
Last Modified: Thursday, January 24, 2008 at 11:45 p.m.
LEXINGTON - Several Lexington water and sewer customers are wondering why their bills have increased recently, while those who only are hooked onto the water system want to know why they have a monthly $5 sewer charge.
City leaders say the costs are necessary to pay off a $1.3 million loan from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The loan was used to pay for the sewer system.
"We're trying to keep the town from going bankrupt, basically," Mayor Herman Jaggers said. "It we hadn't started working with the USDA to pay off these arrears, they would have foreclosed on us and put somebody in here to work on it."
Jaggers said the loan is to be repaid over 40 years and payments amount to about $83,000 to $84,000 a year.
He said prior administrations had allowed the town to get behind on the payments.
"We've tried to catch up but haven't been able to," Jaggers said. "We've tried to work with the USDA to get caught up and have been trying to come up with a plan. They've been very good to work with us. They've been more patient than probably I'd have been if I were in their place."
He said that debt is why water customers have the monthly $5 sewer rates tacked on to their bill, and why water and sewer rates have increased.
"Your sewer never pays for itself," the mayor said. "The water department has to underwrite it."
That decision didn't sit well with some customers, many of whom are expected to attend tonight's water and sewer board meeting. The 7 p.m. meeting is at the town's senior center.
"I expect a big crowd there," Jaggers said.
Brent Davis is among those who plan to attend.
"There's been a big uproar, especially from people living outside the city limits," said Davis, who uses the town's water but not sewer, and wants to know why he must pay the monthly $5 sewer charge.
"Most people out in the county who are on the town's water have a septic tank," he said. "Personally, we don't think what they're doing is legal.
"They borrowed money from the USDA for the sewer, and I don't see how they can charge anybody for what they're not using."
Davis said some residents have discussed asking state Attorney General Troy King's office if the town's actions are legal.
"The water bill, itself, is outrageous, compared to other areas," Davis said.
He said he had long paid about $15.95 a month on his water bill, but that was increased by some $10 a couple of years ago to repair some leaks and hasn't decreased.
"That never went off, and now they've added to it," he said. "That's $31 a month for minimal use."
Davis said he has heard complaints from customers who are receiving bills of $70 to $90 a month.
"If they don't give us any satisfaction, we're going to turn it over to Troy King," Davis said.
Jaggers said he has tried to be up front with customers and even added a note to the most recent bills, explaining about the past-due loan from the USDA.
The mayor said there are about 930 customers on the system, and, like any small system, that amounts to higher costs per unit to keep it operating and pay bills.
"People have it in their minds that the money is going to the USDA, and that's not the case," he said. "The USDA is the one who financed the sewer system, and this is just paying them back."
He said if the bills aren't paid and the USDA takes over, then the federal government would decide on monthly charges, and the town would have no authority in the matter.
"They would have charged whatever it took," Jaggers said. "Once you actually go into bankruptcy, which we were headed for, it's nasty."
The mayor said the town also is dealing with issues surrounding its water supply. Those issues, which include concern over the town's water supply, have gotten the attention of the Alabama Department of Environmental Management.
"ADEM has firmly requested that we look for other sources (of water)," Jaggers said. "So, we're fixing to have to find some alternative sources to what we presently use, and all of this is going to cost a great deal of money. We're trying to get ahead of this a little bit and not borrow money for it."
Bernie Delinski can be reached at 740-5739 or bernie.delinski@timesdaily.com.
Next Article in Local News
-
Officials want laws regarding passengers in pickup beds
Town Creek Police Chief Jerry Garrett said he has made thousands of traffic stops during his career in law enforcement, many of them different or unusual.
But he'll never forget a traffic stop he made in 2007.
"I was near the intersection...
Events Calendar More Events Submit Event
- Father indicted for child abuse
- Officials want laws regarding passengers in pickup beds
- Patriots coach fired 5 games in
- Police hunt for Sheffield man
- At home with the Sabans
- Eyes on the prize
- UNA has unfinished business
- Law & Order
- Brooks will try to flip the script against rival Deshler
- Forbidden love
- Parents seek solution for coughs and colds -162 min ago
- Familiar faces crowd second round -162 min ago
- Stop your whining -162 min ago
- Indians explode in second half -162 min ago
- Thanks for new ways of holidays -162 min ago
- Man indicted for alleged assault on wife, daughter -162 min ago
- Man accused of damaging computers -162 min ago
- Johnson's double-double lift Convenant Christian -162 min ago
- Defensive effort lifts Russellville -162 min ago
- Rinse, repeat -162 min ago

Comments
Post a comment | View all comments on this topic.
January 26, 2008 11:44:12 am
RE: http://www.timesdaily.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080125/NEWS/801250327
There were some misleading remarks in this article:
1. Mayor Herman Jaggars mentioned previous administrations. There was only one previous administration, the former mayor, who oversaw the building of the sewer. I cannot imagine anyone holding him resposnible (at least totally) for the mess the water department is now in.
2. Jaggers and the town sold the town's clinic to pay off the back debt on the system. They said at that time the system would pay for itself. Apparently it isn't.
3. Jaggers said the fees should come down the last time they went up. Now they are going up again.
4. Originally anyone close enough to connect to the system had to pay whether they connected or not. I can understand this. What I cannot understand is why they are being charged when they connect to the system, at their own expense, and the system does not work for them due to improper installation.
5. If the town is so concerned about shortages in the Lexington Water Department, why did they not allow a forensic audit three years ago when it determined as much as 40K might be missing?
Report this comment
January 26, 2008 1:18:28 pm
Lexington gave a piece of land to the Dixie Youth girls softball program a few years back , when they finally raised enough money to start fixing it up Jaggers told them that the land could not be used for another softball field. I know this for sure because I was there when he said that they could not use it. If he will take something back from the children of this town he will take from anyone. You just can't stoop much lower than that.
Report this comment
January 27, 2008 1:33:48 pm
Before Jaggers, that happened twice to the Lions' Club. That's why you never do just a handshake deal. It's called a gentlemen's agreement, but usually one of them turns out not to be a gentleman...
Report this comment
February 4, 2008 8:46:19 am
A correction: I assumed Bernie's article referred to the sewer. Apparently the water department itself still owes money from the early 1970s, so many administrations would be involved.
Jaggers did say at the town mtg. that the USDA listing for the new 5.00 charge was misleading. Several citizens announced they were going to report this to the ethics commission. I'm not sure if this would be a breach of ethics or not, but apparently not all of the 5.00 is going to the USDA (sewer loan).
It is common knowledge that the town is about to be sued by the parents of the neonate who died in November (I know it is difficult to sue a public entity, but it is done frequently). Perhaps Lexington would do well to disband their charter. Any Lexingtonians out there?
Report this comment
February 4, 2008 10:33:52 am
These links may help provide info on the issue.
www.ago.alabama.gov/pdfopinions/99-00169.pdf
www.ago.alabama.gov/oldopinions/8900440.pdf
Report this comment
Post a comment | View all comments